{"id":241,"date":"2008-11-04T13:13:42","date_gmt":"2008-11-04T11:13:42","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/francescophoto.wordpress.com\/?page_id=241"},"modified":"2024-04-16T18:22:26","modified_gmt":"2024-04-16T16:22:26","slug":"24-mpx","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/francescophoto.it\/blog\/24-mpx\/","title":{"rendered":"24 Mpx"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Crop di foto della D700 ridimensionate alla grandezza corrispondente a quella della A900 (6048&#215;4032) visualizzate al 100 %. La foto intera in queste dimensioni avrebbe le misure di 180&#215;120 cm.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Esterno<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>100 Iso<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_243\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-243\" style=\"width: 505px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"https:\/\/francescophoto.it\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2008\/11\/est_24m_100iso.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-243 size-full\" title=\"est_24m_100iso\" src=\"https:\/\/francescophoto.it\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2008\/11\/est_24m_100iso.jpg\" alt=\"D700 - 100 Iso - A900\" width=\"505\" height=\"250\" srcset=\"https:\/\/francescophoto.it\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2008\/11\/est_24m_100iso.jpg 505w, https:\/\/francescophoto.it\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2008\/11\/est_24m_100iso-500x248.jpg 500w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 505px) 100vw, 505px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-243\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">D700 &#8211; 100 Iso &#8211; A900<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>Rumore assente, la A900 ha una nitidezza superiore.<\/p>\n<p>800 Iso<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_244\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-244\" style=\"width: 505px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"https:\/\/francescophoto.it\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2008\/11\/est_24m_800iso.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-244 size-full\" title=\"est_24m_800iso\" src=\"https:\/\/francescophoto.it\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2008\/11\/est_24m_800iso.jpg\" alt=\"D700 - 800 Iso - A900\" width=\"505\" height=\"250\" srcset=\"https:\/\/francescophoto.it\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2008\/11\/est_24m_800iso.jpg 505w, https:\/\/francescophoto.it\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2008\/11\/est_24m_800iso-500x248.jpg 500w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 505px) 100vw, 505px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-244\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">D700 &#8211; 800 Iso &#8211; A900<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>Leggero rumore per entrambe, Sony pi\u00f9 nitida.<\/p>\n<p>1600 Iso<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_246\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-246\" style=\"width: 505px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"https:\/\/francescophoto.it\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2008\/11\/est_24m_1600iso.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-246 size-full\" title=\"est_24m_1600iso\" src=\"https:\/\/francescophoto.it\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2008\/11\/est_24m_1600iso.jpg\" alt=\"D700 - 1600 Iso - A900\" width=\"505\" height=\"250\" srcset=\"https:\/\/francescophoto.it\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2008\/11\/est_24m_1600iso.jpg 505w, https:\/\/francescophoto.it\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2008\/11\/est_24m_1600iso-500x248.jpg 500w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 505px) 100vw, 505px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-246\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">D700 &#8211; 1600 Iso &#8211; A900<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>Anche qui il rumore \u00e8 comparabile, ma la Sony ha maggior nitidezza.<\/p>\n<p>3200 Iso<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_247\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-247\" style=\"width: 505px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"https:\/\/francescophoto.it\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2008\/11\/est_24m_3200iso.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-247 size-full\" title=\"est_24m_3200iso\" src=\"https:\/\/francescophoto.it\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2008\/11\/est_24m_3200iso.jpg\" alt=\"D700 - 3200 Iso - A900\" width=\"505\" height=\"250\" srcset=\"https:\/\/francescophoto.it\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2008\/11\/est_24m_3200iso.jpg 505w, https:\/\/francescophoto.it\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2008\/11\/est_24m_3200iso-500x248.jpg 500w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 505px) 100vw, 505px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-247\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">D700 &#8211; 3200 Iso &#8211; A900<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>Il rumore aumenta per entrambe, quello di Sony \u00e8 un po&#8217; pi\u00f9 fastidioso per la sua componente di crominanza. La Sony per\u00f2 \u00e8 sempre superiore per nitidezza e risoluzione.<\/p>\n<p>6400 Iso<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_248\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-248\" style=\"width: 505px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"https:\/\/francescophoto.it\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2008\/11\/est_24m_6400iso.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-248 size-full\" title=\"est_24m_6400iso\" src=\"https:\/\/francescophoto.it\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2008\/11\/est_24m_6400iso.jpg\" alt=\"D700 - 6400 Iso - A900\" width=\"505\" height=\"250\" srcset=\"https:\/\/francescophoto.it\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2008\/11\/est_24m_6400iso.jpg 505w, https:\/\/francescophoto.it\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2008\/11\/est_24m_6400iso-500x248.jpg 500w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 505px) 100vw, 505px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-248\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">D700 &#8211; 6400 Iso &#8211; A900<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>Qui il rumore della Sony diventa fastidioso nelle aree scure dell&#8217;immagine. Quello della Nikon, pur presente, da meno fastidio perch\u00e8 \u00e8 prevalentemente di luminanza, quindi pi\u00f9 simile alla grana delle pellicole. Risoluzione e nitidezza comparabili.<\/p>\n<p>Complessivamente per le foto in esterno ben illuminati la Sony si dimostra superiore per risolvenza e nitidezza. Il rumore \u00e8 sullo stesso livello fino a 1600 Iso, poi \u00e8 superiore nella Sony a da 3200 Iso, anche se disturba veramente solo a 6400.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Interno<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>100 Iso<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_251\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-251\" style=\"width: 505px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"https:\/\/francescophoto.it\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2008\/11\/int_24m_100iso.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-251 size-full\" title=\"int_24m_100iso\" src=\"https:\/\/francescophoto.it\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2008\/11\/int_24m_100iso.jpg\" alt=\"D700 - 100 Iso - A900\" width=\"505\" height=\"250\" srcset=\"https:\/\/francescophoto.it\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2008\/11\/int_24m_100iso.jpg 505w, https:\/\/francescophoto.it\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2008\/11\/int_24m_100iso-500x248.jpg 500w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 505px) 100vw, 505px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-251\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">D700 &#8211; 100 Iso &#8211; A900<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>Il rumore \u00e8 ovviamente assente. Spicca la Sony per la maggior risoluzione e nitidezza dell&#8217;immagine.<\/p>\n<p>800 Iso<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_252\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-252\" style=\"width: 505px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"https:\/\/francescophoto.it\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2008\/11\/int_24m_800iso.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-252 size-full\" title=\"int_24m_800iso\" src=\"https:\/\/francescophoto.it\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2008\/11\/int_24m_800iso.jpg\" alt=\"D700 - 800 Iso - A900\" width=\"505\" height=\"250\" srcset=\"https:\/\/francescophoto.it\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2008\/11\/int_24m_800iso.jpg 505w, https:\/\/francescophoto.it\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2008\/11\/int_24m_800iso-500x248.jpg 500w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 505px) 100vw, 505px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-252\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">D700 &#8211; 800 Iso &#8211; A900<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>Risultati abbastanza simili, anche se l&#8217;immagine della Sony ha una risoluzione e nitidezza leggermente maggiore.<\/p>\n<p>3200 Iso<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_283\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-283\" style=\"width: 505px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"https:\/\/francescophoto.it\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2008\/11\/int_24m_3200iso1.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-283 size-full\" title=\"int_24m_3200iso1\" src=\"https:\/\/francescophoto.it\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2008\/11\/int_24m_3200iso1.jpg\" alt=\"D700 - 3200 Iso - A900\" width=\"505\" height=\"250\" srcset=\"https:\/\/francescophoto.it\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2008\/11\/int_24m_3200iso1.jpg 505w, https:\/\/francescophoto.it\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2008\/11\/int_24m_3200iso1-500x248.jpg 500w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 505px) 100vw, 505px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-283\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">D700 &#8211; 3200 Iso &#8211; A900<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>Rumore analogo per entrambe, anche se diverso: luminanza per Nikon, crominanza per Sony. Nitidezza simile.<\/p>\n<p>6400 Iso<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_254\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-254\" style=\"width: 505px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"https:\/\/francescophoto.it\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2008\/11\/int_24m_6400iso.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-254 size-full\" title=\"int_24m_6400iso\" src=\"https:\/\/francescophoto.it\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2008\/11\/int_24m_6400iso.jpg\" alt=\"D700 - 6400 Iso - A900\" width=\"505\" height=\"250\" srcset=\"https:\/\/francescophoto.it\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2008\/11\/int_24m_6400iso.jpg 505w, https:\/\/francescophoto.it\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2008\/11\/int_24m_6400iso-500x248.jpg 500w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 505px) 100vw, 505px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-254\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">D700 &#8211; 6400 Iso &#8211; A900<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>Rumore maggiore per Nikon, probabilmente dovuto al filtro antirumore pi\u00f9 intenso in Sony, che infatti \u00e8 anche leggermente meno nitida.<\/p>\n<p>Per le foto in interni alle basse sensibilit\u00e0 non c&#8217;\u00e8 storia e la Sony \u00e8 nettamente superiore. A quelle alte si equivalgono per nitidezza e rumore.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Risoluzione<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>100 Iso<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_257\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-257\" style=\"width: 505px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"https:\/\/francescophoto.it\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2008\/11\/lab_24m_100iso1.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-257 size-full\" title=\"lab_24m_100iso1\" src=\"https:\/\/francescophoto.it\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2008\/11\/lab_24m_100iso1.jpg\" alt=\"D700 - 100 Iso - A900\" width=\"505\" height=\"250\" srcset=\"https:\/\/francescophoto.it\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2008\/11\/lab_24m_100iso1.jpg 505w, https:\/\/francescophoto.it\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2008\/11\/lab_24m_100iso1-500x248.jpg 500w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 505px) 100vw, 505px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-257\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">D700 &#8211; 100 Iso &#8211; A900<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>Non c&#8217;\u00e8 confronto fra Sony e Nikon.<\/p>\n<p>800 Iso<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_258\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-258\" style=\"width: 505px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"https:\/\/francescophoto.it\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2008\/11\/lab_24m_800iso.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-258 size-full\" title=\"lab_24m_800iso\" src=\"https:\/\/francescophoto.it\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2008\/11\/lab_24m_800iso.jpg\" alt=\"D700 - 800 Iso - A900\" width=\"505\" height=\"250\" srcset=\"https:\/\/francescophoto.it\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2008\/11\/lab_24m_800iso.jpg 505w, https:\/\/francescophoto.it\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2008\/11\/lab_24m_800iso-500x248.jpg 500w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 505px) 100vw, 505px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-258\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">D700 &#8211; 800 Iso &#8211; A900<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>Sony ancora nettamente superiore.<\/p>\n<p>1600 Iso<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_259\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-259\" style=\"width: 505px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"https:\/\/francescophoto.it\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2008\/11\/lab_24m_1600iso.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-259 size-full\" title=\"lab_24m_1600iso\" src=\"https:\/\/francescophoto.it\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2008\/11\/lab_24m_1600iso.jpg\" alt=\"D700 - 1600 Iso - A900\" width=\"505\" height=\"250\" srcset=\"https:\/\/francescophoto.it\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2008\/11\/lab_24m_1600iso.jpg 505w, https:\/\/francescophoto.it\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2008\/11\/lab_24m_1600iso-500x248.jpg 500w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 505px) 100vw, 505px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-259\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">D700 &#8211; 1600 Iso &#8211; A900<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>Sony ancora meglio di Nikon.<\/p>\n<p>3200 Iso<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_260\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-260\" style=\"width: 505px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"https:\/\/francescophoto.it\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2008\/11\/lab_24m_3200iso.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-260 size-full\" title=\"lab_24m_3200iso\" src=\"https:\/\/francescophoto.it\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2008\/11\/lab_24m_3200iso.jpg\" alt=\"D700 - 3200 Iso - A900\" width=\"505\" height=\"250\" srcset=\"https:\/\/francescophoto.it\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2008\/11\/lab_24m_3200iso.jpg 505w, https:\/\/francescophoto.it\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2008\/11\/lab_24m_3200iso-500x248.jpg 500w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 505px) 100vw, 505px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-260\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">D700 &#8211; 3200 Iso &#8211; A900<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>Anche qui Sony superiore a Nikon.<\/p>\n<p>6400 Iso<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_261\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-261\" style=\"width: 505px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"https:\/\/francescophoto.it\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2008\/11\/lab_24m_6400iso.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-261 size-full\" title=\"lab_24m_6400iso\" src=\"https:\/\/francescophoto.it\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2008\/11\/lab_24m_6400iso.jpg\" alt=\"D700 - 6400 Iso - A900\" width=\"505\" height=\"250\" srcset=\"https:\/\/francescophoto.it\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2008\/11\/lab_24m_6400iso.jpg 505w, https:\/\/francescophoto.it\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2008\/11\/lab_24m_6400iso-500x248.jpg 500w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 505px) 100vw, 505px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-261\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">D700 &#8211; 6400 Iso &#8211; A900<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>Nonostante l&#8217;intervento del filtro antirumore anche qui Sony \u00e8 migliore di Nikon.<\/p>\n<p>Per quanto riguarda la risolvenza ovviamente non c&#8217;\u00e8 storia. I 24 Mpx contro 12 significano un vantaggio di circa il 43 % per quandto riguarda la risolvenza, sia orizzontale che verticale, che si fa sentire.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Crop di foto della D700 ridimensionate alla grandezza corrispondente a quella della A900 (6048&#215;4032) visualizzate al 100 %. La foto intera in queste dimensioni avrebbe le misure di 180&#215;120 cm. Esterno 100 Iso Rumore assente, la A900 ha una nitidezza superiore. 800 Iso Leggero rumore per entrambe, Sony pi\u00f9 nitida. 1600 Iso Anche qui il &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/francescophoto.it\/blog\/24-mpx\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continua la lettura di <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">24 Mpx<\/span> <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-241","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/francescophoto.it\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/241","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/francescophoto.it\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/francescophoto.it\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/francescophoto.it\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/francescophoto.it\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=241"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/francescophoto.it\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/241\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":73751,"href":"https:\/\/francescophoto.it\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/241\/revisions\/73751"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/francescophoto.it\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=241"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}